A TYPICAL
COLLABORATIVE FAMILY-LAW AGREEMENT
[WIFE] and her
attorney [NAME] and [HUSBAND] and his attorney [NAME], have chosen to use the
principles of Collaborative Law to settle the issues arising from the
dissolution of their marriage. The
primary goal of Collaborative Law is to settle in a nonadversarial manner the issues of the parties= separation
and dissolution of their marriage.
The parties have retained Collaborative lawyers to assist them in
reaching this goal. Whenever the
pronoun “we” is used in this agreement, it is implied that our attorneys agree
and will actively participate to achieve the desired
result.
1.
PURPOSE AND
GOALS We acknowledge
that the essence of "Collaborative Law" is the shared belief by participants
that it is in the best interests of parties and their families in typical Family
Law matters to commit themselves to avoiding litigation. We therefore adopt this conflict resolution process, which does not rely on a
Court‑imposed resolution, but relies on an atmosphere of honesty, cooperation,
integrity and professionalism geared toward the future well‑being of the
family. Our goal is to minimize, if
not eliminate, the negative economic, social and emotional consequences of
protracted litigation to the participants and their families. We commit ourselves to the Collaborative
Law process and agree to seek a better way to resolve our differences justly and
equitably. Specifically, we agree
as follows:
a.
No Court
Intervention: We commit ourselves to settling our case
without court intervention.
b.
Full
Disclosure: We agree to give full, honest and open
disclosure of all information, whether requested or not. The parties and their lawyers agree to
deal with each other in good faith to promptly provide all necessary and
reasonable information requested.
No formal discovery procedure will be used unless specifically agreed to
in advance by the parties.
i.
Documents: A List of Documents
proposed to be shared among the parties and counsel is attached to this
Agreement as Exhibit A.
Additionally, all correspondence, and a memo of telephone or personal
contacts, between an attorney and a neutral expert retained by the parties shall
be shared with the other counsel and client.
ii.
Requirement of
Good Faith. We
acknowledge that by using informal discovery, we are giving up certain
investigative procedures and methods that would be available to us in the
litigation process. We give up these
measures with the specific understanding that both of us shall make full
and fair disclosure of all assets, income, debts and other information necessary
for a fair settlement.
Participation in the Collaborative Law process, and the settlement
reached, is based upon the assumption that both of us will and have acted in
good faith and have provided complete and accurate information to the best of
our ability.
(1)
Sworn
Statement. We may be required to sign a sworn
statement making full and fair disclosure of their income, assets and
debts.
c.
Communication: We agree to engage in informal
discussions and conferences to settle all issues. We intend to communicate effectively
with each other to efficiently and economically settle the dissolution of our
marriage.
i.
Tone of
Communications. Written and verbal communications will
be respectful and constructive and we will not make accusations or claims not
based in fact.
ii.
Focus of
Communications. Communications during settlement
meetings will be focused on the economic and parenting issues in the dissolution
and the constructive resolution of those issues.
iii.
Interruptions. We will not interrupt each other or the
attorneys during settlement discussions.
iv.
Acknowledgment
and Respect. We will respectfully acknowledge and
make every effort to understand the other party=s point of
view, even if we do not agree with it.
v.
Past
Events. We understand that the costs for
settlement meetings are substantial and require everyone=s cooperation
to make the best possible use of available resources. To achieve this goal, we agree not to
engage in unnecessary discussions of past events.
vi.
No Pressure
Outside Collaborative Process. To maintain an objective and
constructive process, we agree not to pressure each other to discuss settlement
of their dissolution issues outside the settlement-conference setting. Discussions outside of the conference
setting must be agreed to by us.
Neither of us will attempt to discuss settlement at unannounced times by
telephone calls or appearances at the other party=s
residence.
vii.
Directions to
Consultants. We agree to direct all attorneys,
accountants, therapists, appraisers and other consultants retained by us to work
in a cooperative effort to resolve issues without resort to litigation or any
other external decision- making process except as agreed
upon.
2.
SCOPE OF
AGREEMENT: We may at any
time by subsequent agreement decide to expand or narrow the scope of this
Collaborative Law Process. At
present, however, we agree that the issues to be determined are summarized on
the Collaborative Family-Law Checklist attached to this Agreement as
Exhibit B.
3.
CONSEQUENCES
OF COURT INTERVENTION:
a.
Withdrawal of
Attorneys: We
understand that our attorneys' representation is limited to the Collaborative
Law process and that neither of our attorneys can ever represent us in
court in a proceeding against the other spouse.
i.
Disqualification. In the event a court filing is
unavoidable, both attorneys will be disqualified from representing either of
us.
b.
Disqualification
of Consultants and Experts. In the event that the Collaborative Law
process terminates, accountants, appraisers, arbitrators, mediators, neutral
evaluators, therapists, and any other consultants and/or experts will be
disqualified as witnesses and their work product will be incompetent and
inadmissible as evidence unless we agree otherwise in
writing.
c.
Cooling-Off
Period: If one of us decides to withdraw from
the Collaborative Law process, prompt written notice will be given to the other
party through his or her lawyer.
Upon withdrawal from the Collaborative Law process there will be a thirty
[30] day waiting period (unless there is an emergency) before any court hearing,
to permit the other party to retain another lawyer and make an orderly
transition. All temporary
agreements will remain in full force and effect during this period. The intent of this provision is to avoid
surprise and prejudice to the rights of the other party. It is therefore mutually agreed that
either of us
may bring this provision to the attention of the Court in
requesting a postponement of a hearing, and the other party will acknowledge
this provision.
4.
OTHER
TERMINATION OF ATTORNEY SERVICES. Either of us is free to discharge our
attorney, for any reason, and to retain the services of another attorney,
without causing an automatic termination of the Collaborative Law process. Similarly, if an attorney is unable, for
any reason, to continue representation in this matter, the affected party shall
be free to obtain the services of substitute counsel. However, no attorney who has been
involved at any stage of the Collaborative Law process in this matter shall be
competent to appear on behalf of either of us in an adversarial court proceeding
against the other party.
5.
FINALIZATION
OF AGREEMENT: Unless
otherwise agreed, prior to reaching final agreement on all issues, no Summons
and Complaint
will be served or filed, nor will any other motion or document be
prepared or filed which would initiate court intervention.
a.
Form of
Written Settlement Agreement: Neither we nor our lawyers will use the
court during the Collaborative Law process unless it is mutually agreed. When we
have reached a final agreement, our agreement will be reduced to writing in a
document designated a North Carolina Collaborative Family-Law Settlement
Agreement, in the form of either:
i.
A
Separation Agreement, in which we are bound by contract, and which may be
enforced in the event of breach by an action for damages or specific performance
(although we commit to attempt to use further Collaborative processes to resolve
the dispute prior to initiating court action); or
ii.
A AFriendly
Lawsuit.@
(1)
Parties: For the purposes of the Collaborative
Law proceeding, if we use a Afriendly
lawsuit,@ the named
plaintiff shall be the *, and the defendant shall be the *, without any
implication that the plaintiff is the injured party nor
the defendant the responding party.
(2)
Venue: Venue for the Afriendly
lawsuit@ shall be *
County, and by signing this Agreement we expressly, knowingly and intelligently
waive any objections to venue. In
the event that either of us withdraws from the Collaborative process and
institutes litigation, venue shall be as in this subparagraph, absent further
written agreement signed by both of us.
(3)
Form of
Document: If we formalize our
agreement in this way, the document filed with the court shall be designated a
consent judgment and/or order, signed by us and our respective attorneys. The consent judgment and/or order may
incorporate by reference all or only some of the terms of our North Carolina
Collaborative Family-Law Settlement Agreement.
iii.
Special
Orders: We
understand and agree that in some cases it may be necessary to obtain a court
order to achieve a desired result, even we would prefer
to memorialize our agreement solely in a private Separation Agreement.
Therefore, we do agree, upon the terms set out above as to a AFriendly
Lawsuit,@ that the
Collaborative Law process may necessitate entry of, by way of illustration and
not by limitation, the following types of orders (for example, to divide
retirement benefits or secure medical insurance benefits):
(1)
Qualified
Domestic Relations Orders (for pension
or retirement benefits governed by ERISA);
(2)
Domestic
Relations Orders (for pension
or retirement benefits not governed by ERISA);
(3)
Decrees of
Separate Maintenance (to achieve
division of IRA benefits or to effect the desired filing status for tax
purposes);
(4)
Qualified
Medical Support Court Orders (to secure
insurance benefits); and/or
(5)
Absolute
Divorce Decrees (an absolute
divorce cannot be secured by contract in North Carolina, and must be obtained by
court order.)
iv.
Enforcement of
Temporary and/or Final Orders: In the event that either of us requires
a temporary agreement for any purpose, the agreement will be put in writing and
signed by the us and our lawyers.
If either of us withdraws from the Collaborative process, the written
agreement may be presented to the Court as a basis for an Order, which the Court
may make retroactive to the date of the written agreement. Similarly, once a final agreement is
signed, if either of us should refuse to honor it, the final agreement may be
presented to the Court to be enforced in any subsequent
action.
(1)
Collaborative
Attorneys Will Not Participate: Except as a
possible fact witness, neither of the our attorneys
will appear in an adversarial procedure in court to enforce, modify,
challenge or vacate an agreement reached during the Collaborative
process.
(a)
Exceptions: Our
attorneys shall, however, remain available to assist in any further
Collaborative process that may be required to resolve problems arising under
agreements reached during the Collaborative process. Our attorneys may also
make court appearances for the purposes of entering agreed-upon and uncontested
orders, such as QDRO=s,
DRO=s, Decrees of
Separate Maintenance, complaints for absolute divorce (uncontested), and motions
for summary judgment in uncontested divorce cases.
6.
CHILDREN=S
ISSUES: The parties
recognize that children frequently suffer greatly during the process of divorce,
and commit to minimizing the trauma to and disruption of their
children=s lives. To that end, the parties agree as
follows:
a.
Settlement
Issues Will Not Be Discussed in the Presence of the Parties' Children,
The parties
acknowledge that inappropriate communications regarding their dissolution can be
harmful to their children.
Communication with the children regarding these issues will occur only if
it is appropriate and done by mutual agreement or with the advice of a child
specialist. The parties
specifically agree that their children will not be included in any discussion
regarding the dissolution except as described in this
Agreement.
b.
The Children
Will Not Be Interrogated. Neither party will interrogate a child
as to the activities of the other parent or the events in the home of the other
parent.
c.
The Children
Will Not Be Asked to Choose Between or Blame Either Parent. The parties acknowledge that children
should not be forced to choose between their parents, and should be permitted
access to and affection for both parents.
The parties acknowledge that the children need both parents in their
lives, and that they are hurt when one party criticizes or blames the other
parent.
d.
Access to the
Children Will Not Be Withheld. Absent a serious danger of physical or
sexual abuse, neither parent will attempt to impede access to the children by
the other parent. The parties by
entering into this Agreement recognize that neither parent poses a threat to the
children, and that the Collaborative Law process is inappropriate for cases
involving physical or sexual abuse of a child. The children shall have reasonable
telephone access to the parties, and the parties shall have reasonable telephone
access to the children. Each party
shall promptly inform the other of any serious accident, illness, or other
mishap that may involve the children.
Each party shall have equal access to records regarding the
children=s education,
health, activities and general welfare.
Access to the children shall not be denied to the children=s extended
family, such as grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins and other
relatives.
e.
Issue
Resolution. In resolving issues about sharing the
enjoyment of and responsibility for our children, the parties, attorneys and
therapists shall make every effort to reach amicable solutions that promote the
children's best interests.
f.
Custody
Evaluation. The parties agree not to seek, absent
further written agreement, a custody evaluation while the matter is a
Collaborative Law case.
g.
Involvement in
Disputes. The parties agree to insulate the
children from involvement in their disputes.
h.
Removal from
State. The parties agree not to remove the
children from the State of North Carolina absent the explicit written consent of
the other parent. However, the
parties further agree that consent to such removal for vacations or other
legitimate activities shall not be unreasonably withheld.
i.
Parenting
Programs. Where such programs are available (such
as APartners in
Parenting,@ the parties agree to attend programs
designed to help them understand and cope with children=s issues in
divorce.
7.
EXPERTS. When appropriate and needed, the parties
will use neutral experts for purposes of valuation, cash-flow analysis,
parenting issues and any other issue which requires expert advice and/or
recommendations. The parties will
agree in advance as to how the costs of the third party expert will be
paid. If experts are needed, we
will retain them jointly unless we and our attorneys agree otherwise in
writing. A List of Experts
that will or may be used in the Collaborative process is attached to this
Agreement as Exhibit C.
8.
SPECIAL
DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ARBITRATION/MEDIATION). We recognize that even in the
Collaborative process, and even when both parties and their attorneys are fully
committed to the process, issues may arise as to which agreement cannot be
reached. Should such an issue or
issues arise, we agree to submit the matter to mediation, mediation/arbitration,
or binding arbitration under the North Carolina Family Law Arbitration Act. An arbitrator=s decision
will be binding only in the Collaborative Law process, and if the process is
terminated unsuccessfully, the arbitrator=s decision may
not be used in court. The
parties further agree that (NAME) shall act as the mediator and/or
arbitrator. If (NAME) is
unavailable, we will mutually agree to another arbitrator, and preference shall
be given to an attorney who is board-certified in family law. If we cannot agree on a mediator or
arbitrator, our lawyers shall select the neutral
facilitator.
The Arbitrator
is authorized to adjudicate any issue which, in the discretion of both attorneys
and clients, is better resolved by an informal submission for determination by a
neutral third party but does not rise to the level of litigation that threatens
the integrity of the collaborative law process. All decisions of the Arbitrator shall be
in writing and shall become part of our Collaborative Family-Law Settlement
Agreement. If we elect to have our
Settlement Agreement adopted by the Court, all decisions of the Arbitrator shall
be filed with our Settlement Agreement, as part of the Consent Order and
Judgment, and shall be enforceable and/or modifiable as any other order of the
Court. Absent a subsequent written
agreement, we waive our respective rights to appeal the orders or awards of the
Arbitrator for errors of law. We
also agree that the Arbitrator may not be dismissed, disqualified, or challenged
for cause unilaterally, but rather that the consent of both of us is required to
do so. The arbitrator=s decision is
binding only within the Collaborative Law process, and will have no effect if
the collaborative process ends.